Art And Meaning

Posted on by

Chairs

The random arrangement of visual elements juxtaposing lights and darks in this image comes near to creating abstraction because the subject matter is easily “read.” Another aesthetic feature here is the number of visual elements, each tonal change representing one of them. The more there are, the more complex the image, so there’s increased potential in the amount of information that can be derived such an image.

For instance, a photograph of just one chair would communicate “Look at this chair.” Consciously or unconsciously the viewer would wonder what’s so special about it? The image of multiple chairs generates many more questions: Where are these chairs? Who sat in them? Is this the random aftermath of a business meeting, party or ceremony? Or were these chairs just set to one side so someone could clean the other side of the deck? And is this really a deck? It could be a boardwalk. Might there be more than meets the eye here?

Abstracted images tend to challenge us, however briefly, to make sense of what we’re seeing. We want to grasp the meaning, part of which has to do with why the artist formalizing the subject matter within a frame. What did he or she see? And what’s so special about this subject that we should give it our attention? In this we’re attempting to understand the image-maker as well as the object represented.

In looking at an object we reach out for it. With an invisible finger we move through the space around us, go out to the distinct places where things are found, touch them, catch them, scan their surfaces, trace their borders, explore their texture.

Rudolf Arnheim (Art Theorist)

In many, if not most instances, the mind of the artist is as important as the subject being represented. We’re always trying to validate our world view or understand if there’s value in someone else’s perception that we might be missing, particularly when there’s a discrepancy. It’s why art historians, critics and others maintain that the function of art is to challenge, upset or overturn conventional ways of seeing and thinking.

According to social psychologist, Roy Baumeister, “What sets human beings apart from animals is not the pursuit of happiness, which occurs all across the natural world, but the pursuit of meaning, which is unique to humans.” This, in my view, is the highest function of fine art. However we engage, use or perceive creative works, and irrespective of medium and intent, those who produce it are holding up a mirror to show us who we are, how far we’ve come and what we’re capable of accomplishing. In the process, through the choices they make, is reflected in who they are, how they see and what they value.

So, art plays a significant roll in making sense of diverse personal and social realities. It attempts, and at times defines what it means to be fully human. Across all levels, media and applications, the making and observation of works of art engages us in acts of self-reflection and discovery. Just as instruments reach out to explore space and the depths of the oceans, works of art reveal the dimensions and beauty of the human spirit—wherever and however they are. Even when produced by artificial intelligence which, let us remember, lacking a heart and soul it can only produce through reference and imitation, never through inspiration.

A society that regards the function of “art” as entertainment and appreciation alone, fails to understand that its engagement is nutrition for the collective mind, heart and soul. Museums are not just warehouses for historic and contemporary treasures. They’re arenas rich with potential to stimulate the higher human faculties of observation, imagination, empathy, experimentation, discovery, critical thinking, symbology and aesthetic awakening all toward understanding and making sense of who we are, what we’ve come through and what we can accomplish.

Fundamentally, through expression, artistic works generate questions and stimulate the evolution of consciousness. Some may think this a soft or inconsequential enterprise compared to art produced for the art market, but I would argue that it’s essential for maintaining and advancing the quality of life across the spectrum of time and cultures.

Like the seers and oracles of old, Art sings and shouts from the axis of truth to wake us up to who we are and where we are going.

Alex Gray, Artist

__________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

 

Unity

Posted on by

Although this weld bead is not a good one from the perspective of a welder, it caught my attention as a potentially abstract image, rich with color, texture and highlights. When I came across the image, the word “joining” came to mind, eliciting some observations for contemplation. Some of the metaphoric implications are obvious, others not so much. And because Pierre Teilhard de Chardin S.J. wrote so extensively about the evolutionary dynamics and implications of joining together, I offer some of his quotes. They effectively distill the essence of my observations here.

In the first place, I notice that a bead of molten material, itself metal, is used to unify separate pieces of steel. Although different in properties, they’re the same in essence. Just so, two individuals with differing values or perspectives can become joined in purpose or function by a third party, perhaps a “facilitator” who shares their vision or common objective. When there’s a commonly held purpose or outcome, there’s the potential for bonding. And when it occurs the strength of the outcome is increased considerably. A whole system has greatly expanded potentials and more capability than its members operating separately.

Everything in the universe is made by union and generation—by the coming together of elements that seek out one another, melt together two by two, and are born again in a third.

Teilhard de Chardin S.J.

Metals are “hard-nosed” individuals. They are fixed in their ways, not about to change. They “like” being separate. So much so, they can only be bonded by another metal that has undergone a change of state—transformation—from solid to liquid. In the realm of matter, pliability is a necessary condition for unification. In the human realm this equates to flexibility. And that’s where we have an advantage over metal. Even when individuals are fixed in their ways and disagree, bonding can occur through mutually respectful communication.

Fuller being is closer union.

Teilhard de Chardin S.J.

Importantly, in the above image both pieces of metal retain their individual uniqueness even when they are joined. Analogously, the molten bead represents the power of agreement and compromise. And that’s accomplished in the “fires” of discussion and debate—which should, like the elements that compose the metal, include everyone who has something at stake in the outcome.

True union does not fuse: it differentiates and personalizes.

Teilhard de Chardin S.J.

It may be extending the metaphor too far, but I note in this image that the solidified bead is brighter and shinier than the metals it joins. In the domain of human interaction I take this to indicate that the agent of unification is someone “brighter” in the sense of having an expanded perspective, particularly with regard to the potentials that can be achieved through joining.

Union can only increase through an increase in consciousness, that is to say in vision. That is why the history of the living world can be summarized as the elaboration of ever more perfect eyes within a cosmos in which there is always something more to be seen.

Teilhard de Chardin S.J.

The lesson I draw from the metal and human communication analogy is that separate individuals, hardened in their values, beliefs or perspectives, can unite either through intelligent and wise communication or commonly shared experiences. United, individuals are stronger and capable of achieving far more than working separately.

I do not exist in order that I may possess; rather I exist in order that I may give of myself, for it is in giving that I am myself. Cosmic life is intrinsically communal. Being is first a “we” before it can become an “I.” 

Teilhard de Chardin S.J

To learn more about Pierre Teilhard de Chardin S.J.

“Teilhard” is pronounced: Tay-yar), I highly recommend Spirit of Fire: The Life and Vision of Teilhard de Chardin by Ursula King, revised edition by Orbis Books. It can be found in most public libraries.

Teilhard’s legacy was the formulation of a comprehensive mystical vision that integrated science and spirituality. Science critics didn’t think he added much to the field of evolution or paleontology. And the Catholic Church banned him from publishing during his lifetime, even exiled him to China and New York to prevent him from speaking in public. In particular, his views on evolution negated the Adam and Eve story and original sin. Recent pope’s however, spoke highly of his contributions to Christ-centered spirituality and his though figured prominently in the 2nd Vatican Council.

It’s perhaps no accident that I chose an image of metal for this contemplation. When Teilhard was a child he collected rocks, drawn to them because they were the hardest, most lasting objects he could find. Then one day he discovered a piece of shiny metal under a cart. Because it was much harder than rock, he thought he’d found something that would last forever. He said he “cherished” it. When it was left out in the rain for a time he came running to his mother in tears because this precious object was rusting. He cites this incident as the moment when he became determined to find something that would last forever. He found it in the human spirit.

___________________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

Snow

Posted on by

 

High in the field of frigid darkness

The place where potentials reside,

Atoms rise, congregate and coalesce.

I am born, a vaporous singularity.

 

Wandering there, I reach out to the closest being

A speck of dust carried in an atmospheric wave,

Clinging, descending.

The order within expresses symmetry, six arms.

 

Growing, gaining mass, I descend

Through neighborhoods of varying cold and wet,

More cold my body flattens.

Less cold my arms grow intricate, needle-like crystals.

 

Descending further and gaining momentum

I reach out in seven directions,

Ever growing, expanding, tossed in the wind.

I am not alone.

 

Rising, falling, swirling with my neighbors

Uniqueness become clear,

As does substance as we journey together.

The wind stronger now, carrying us to the same destiny.

 

Approaching the ground, falling together in silence

Trees lift their white burdened arms to greet us,

An orange tabby on a windowsill watches, arches its back.

A doe leads her fawn to a leaf-fallen thicket.

 

Beauty and mystery filled the journey

As singularities became a multitude,

Arriving together in silent curtains of white.

Each of us witness to potentials realized in a spectacle of joining.

David L. Smith

__________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

Point Of View

Posted on by

What we see depends on where we stand

In a film script, Point of View (POV) can indicate the camera position or the viewpoint of a character. In a screening of an episode of “24,” the TV series featuring Kiefer Sutherland, the President of the United States and the Vice-president vehemently disagreed on whether or not to retaliate with a nuclear strike against a middle-eastern nation for a nuclear attack on Los Angeles.

The president wanted to wait for proof that the enemy was a particular nation, but the vice-president was eager to strike back immediately as a show of strength, saying he had enough proof. We viewers knew the truth, that terrorists from two other countries were behind the bombing, so we were pleased when Jack Bauer overcame the terrorists and secured the bombs at the last moment. After watching this drama unfold, it was abundantly clear that a simple but profound characteristic of human consciousness made a monumental difference: one’s point of view.

What we see depends on where we stand—literally and figuratively. And we act according to what we see. To a man barely surviving due to circumstances beyond his control, a social welfare program can be a matter of life or death. To a rich man the same program may seem like an unnecessary tax burden. In thinking about this, I realized that no two human beings see through the same eyes. No matter how close or related we are to one another, we each see the world from a unique point of view. And we don’t  share identical interpretations of what we see.

For instance in this image you may see a pensive, elderly Native American woman, but because I knew her, I see a young and vibrant white woman who played the piano like a rock musician in her modern, upscale house. A primary factor that makes a great difference in perception is information. The more information we have and share, the closer we can come to agreeing upon what we see. For instance, the husband of the woman pictured above had a much more accurate perception of his wife. Then too, can anyone really know the truth of another person? Do we even know ourselves that well? Even the perception of myself is a point of view, an opinion that’s constantly changing. I’m not the person I was yesterday.

Our point of view develops when we first open our eyes. And due to the circumstances of life—age, ethnicity, geography, relationships, education, experiences, values and so on—we construct a gestalt, a “world view,” that is foundational to our personal reality, the truth of how things are for us to us. Curiously, the tendency is to think that our gestalt is better or more accurate than that of most people.

A related phenomenon that’s a consequence of our point of view, is the way we reach out to verify the truth and shy away from anyone or anything that’s in conflict with how we see things. And there are degrees of this. For instance I read science books by authors who don’t believe in God or an afterlife. I continue with these books, in spite of my beliefs to the contrary, because I appreciate the scientific method. On the other hand, if an author writing about quantum physics kept beating the drum to prove his anti-spiritual point of view so vehemently I would have put the book down, not because of the difference in our world views, but because he kept using physics to discredit my belief. I can appreciate an author who states his or her personal perspective; it helps me to know where they stand. But for me, proselytizing goes too far.

Point of view is a fascinating aspect of human consciousness. We’ll defend it to the death—as if it’s The Truth, rather than a personal truth, which is dynamic, ever changing. Dictators and politicians of every stripe rationalize war, even crimes against humanity, with the conviction that their side (point of view) must prevail. The domination paradigm is the ultimate statement of self-centeredness and ignorance—not understanding that living systems grow and thrive as a whole as a consequence of harmonious relationships within and beyond the bounds of leadership. I say “ignorance,” because violence, whatever the circumstance or motivation, only generates more violence.

Evolution is a bottom up process, like a pyramid. The same is true of social and biological systems. When a multitude of cells—figuratively at the bottom of the pyramid—are functioning in balance and and coherence, they support the superstructure. On the other hand, when a cell or group of them become greedy or go “rogue,” looking out for themselves believing their truth is the truth and their method must prevail, the inevitable result is systemic breakdown. Science has shown that evolution does not favor the fittest. It builds on individuals and groups that adapt to changing conditions.

In these days of political division and uncertainty, I am heartened by those who work with the light of intelligence and wisdom, for instance journalists and comedians who reveal untruth, factual inaccuracies, disinformation, false news, deceptions, ignorance and greed. They perform a healing service for the social body simply by identifying the cells that are causing breakdowns, helping us to understand points of view—perspectives—that are toxic for the body—so we can adjust to change appropriate to its health and well-being.

The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.

Brooks Atkinson, American theatre critic

_____________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

How Systems Evolve

Posted on by

Through coherence, parts unite to form whole systems

For me, part of the appeal of this image is that it at once evokes the sensibility of living cells and astronomical bodies—the “innerverse” viewed under a microscope and the universe viewed through a telescope.

At both extremes we observe diverse parts that join together to make a whole, and we see the parts in relation to one another as well as the whole. My curiosity extends to both extremes, but lately my thoughts have been directed to the dynamics of biological systems, and these images prompted some observations that suggested a coincidence between the microscopic and the social.

In The Extended Phenotype published in 1982, British biologist Richard Dawkins introduced the idea that the effects of an animal’s genes or “phenotype” can stretch far into the environment. In 2016, science writer Ed Yong, writing in I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life, gives examples of this noting that “…beaver genes build beaver bodies, but since those bodies go on to make dams, the genes are also redirecting the flow of rivers. A bird’s genes create a bird, but they also make a nest. My genes made my eyes, hands, and brain, and in doing so they also made this book.” This is an example of a whole being greater than the sum of its parts.

So while an animal’s genotype determines the physical characteristics of its offspring, it’s phenotype extends those traits into an “expression” or manifestation that has an affect on the environment. The good news I learned in my Physical Anthropology class is that, although specific genes are inherited, because human beings make considered choices, we can alter their expression, our phenotype—that which shows up.

One’s genetic endowment or genotype, therefore, is largely a predisposition rather than a sentence. And, because it’s the living organism as a whole that contributes (or not) to the next generation, what we do and how we live effects the genes we pass on. And considering that whole, what’s astounding is that each of us is composed of trillions and trillions of cells, each a living being making its own decisions, performing over 100,000 tasks per second! (Biologist Catherine Clinton in a HeartMath interview. And yet we consider our bodies a singularity.

We have to tread lightly in extrapolating from biology to sociology, but in reading about the relationships between microbes, their animal hosts and ecosystems, I can’t help but think there are some lessons to be learned about how we relate as groups. Aside from our cells, in order to be healthy and grow to reproduce, the diverse billions of individual microbes that live inside us are constantly considering: Is this new or unrecognizable incoming entity a suitable dance partner or not? What would be the consequences of our engagement? Is this good for me and the whole in which a play a role? Or not?”

There’s a lot of feeding, moving around and carrying on of conversations, mostly about the neighbors and the neighborhood. The net result of this relating, both in conflict and in harmony, results in the development of communities of like-minded entities, internal “ecosystems” that constitute a survival strategy that has worked since life first appeared on the planet. And rarely, if ever, do we give it a thought.

Socially, might it be that the pressure to engage with people different from us is nature’s way of bringing us together—through conflict as well as harmony within nested ecosystems—to form a new whole entity? Might our physical, mental and emotional urges and preferences constitute the phenotype of the global body? Our collective expression? Considering the consequences of our elections, that would be a resounding “Yes!” And by extension, might our species be developing a global brain? Since it’s founding and because, in part, of its diversity—which is an essential evolutionary ingredient—the United States of America has served as a crucible for the mingling of burning desires and differing beliefs, values and perspectives.

Microbiology informs us that the clash of values, ideas and preferences has been going on between microbes and cells for eons. It may not be comfortable and we might wish it to be otherwise, but just as the microbes inside us engage in energy and information sharing and decision-making that ultimately sustains our bodies, so also we struggle as groups to express our beliefs, values and perspectives so that one day we will open our eyes and realize that, through the union of commonly shared perceptions, values and objectives we have constructed a singularity of purpose and intention that works for everyone.

The dynamic goings-on between the microscopic creatures that populate our bodies suggests to me that, within the crucible the “refinements” that are happening now, though they may be painful, are part of an evolutionary process that requires us to live our best, most authentic lives and keep an open mind when interacting with others. Evolutionary survival value for whole systems is not in being right but in discovering truth and the best way forward for all. We Americans put the Constitution above powerful individuals and groups because, despite our differences, it’s the means by which we create coherence. It’s the operating system that allows us to function as a whole.

From atoms to galaxies, the evolutionary pattern is of diverse parts increasing in complexity and then uniting to form higher level systems. It’s a fundamental cosmic phenomenon that, at the human level, encourages patience and appreciation for the way things are.

Evolution by natural selection depends on just three things: individuals must vary; those variations must be heritable; and those variations must have the potential to affect their fitness—that is, their ability to survive and reproduce. Variation, inheritance, fitness: if all three boxes are ticked, the engine of evolution whirrs into action, pumping out generations that are successively better adapted to their environment. 

Edmund Soon-Weng Yong, British-American science journalist

__________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

Inspiration

Posted on by

This image resulted from inspiration I received many years ago after seeing the work of Jerry Uelsmann, a master of the multiple printing technique. His work caught my attention because he was a graduate of R.I.T.. Although the word inspiration derives from inspiratio, which is Latin for “divine guidance,” a modern dictionary renders it a “process of being mentally stimulated to do or feel something, especially to do something creative.”

While I understand the secular orientation of this definition, I believe that Spirit or universal consciousness is fundamental to the process, with the brain serving as a “tuner,” able to access vibrations (stimulations) emanating from that Source according to interest or desire. In this instance I wanted to see if I could make a print from multiple negatives that would produce an interesting photograph. Starting out I had no idea what might work. Although it has been many years since I made this photograph, I remember the urge and the process as if it occurred yesterday.

A recent interview on Buddha At The Gas Pump between the host, Rick Archer and Marianne Williamson, prompted me to consider this theme because their conversation was inspirational. She not only put the current political crisis into global perspective, she called those of us with a spiritual orientation to task, pointing the way through and strongly urging us to get involved in the political process.

A friend once told me that he only gives money to the people and organizations that inspired him. That appeals to me because it directly supports the expression of our values. Mental health professionals recommend that we distance ourselves from people who, as a pattern, diminish our spirit, and maintain or seek relationships that lift us up. Linda and I keep this in mind in our media selections. We want the media to feed the spirit, not diminish it. On the subject of “guidance,” one our teachers at RIT famously said—

No matter how slow the film, Spirit always stands still long enough for the photographer it has chosen.

                        Minor White, Photographer, educator

After a lifetime of making photographs, I understand what he was saying. Indeed, I often have the feeling of being guided, that the spirit of a subject or object in front of the camera is “calling” to me. Looking back over my body of work and seeing that it does what I’d hoped it would—express my love of God and the world—it’s easy to see how my choices of technology, locations, subject matter, materials, printing and processing techniques were guided. This is especially the case in the images I consider numinous, the experience of a spiritual force. Guided by what or whom? I don’t know for sure, but I think we’re all guided by spirit, especially in matters we deem important for our life’s journey.

For instance, consider one of the major gifts you were born with, one that led to the development of your most passionate interest or occupation. You can probably pinpoint the moment or event that created a “spark,” the urge to learn more about what you experienced. Immediately, doors started to open.  As your interest grew, the “right” people showed up at just the right time to give you a boost. Problems got solved. Books, ideas and resources became available. And synchronicities happened. An example of the road rising up to meet my feet, was when I was 29. An elderly gentleman, Jack J. Smith Jr., to whom I had sold top-of-the-line darkroom equipment four years prior, sold it back to me for one dollar.

“Expressive” photography operates under the principle of attraction or affinity. Because like attracts like, when looking for subject matter, there’s something within the photographer that recognizes a connection when he sees it. Be it subtle or pronounced, there’s an “attraction,” a recognition, a pull of sorts, that urges exploration. In those instances, there’s the potential for an expressive photograph. Whenever I feel the attraction to something, I know guidance is urging me to pay attention. The message is: There’s something here, so work with it.

It is by long obedience and hard work that the artist comes to unforced spontaneity and consummate mastery. Knowing that he can never create anything on his own account, out of the top layers, so to speak, of his personal consciousness, he submits obediently to the workings of ‘inspiration’; and knowing that the medium in which he works has its own self-nature, which must not be ignored or violently overridden, he makes himself its patient servant and, in this way, achieves perfect freedom of expression.

Aldous Huxley, English writer and philosopher

ABOUT THIS IMAGE

Title: Celestial Roots

I randomly pulled out negatives that had clear or nearly clear backgrounds, and set them on a light table. By laying them on top of one another, I was able to see some possibilities. The negative of the stained glass window was especially conducive to multiple printing because of its high contrast. Using it as sort of a “master,” I kept superimposing the window over other negatives until I found one that worked—the tree. The sky behind the tree was overcast, so to remove it I made a copy by sandwiching it with a sheet of high contrast Kodalith film and exposing it under glass to keep it flat. From that positive, I made another copy onto Kodalith film, and that resulted in a negative that I could put in the enlarger.

With an ordinary piece of paper in the easel under the enlarger, I drew a rough outline, first of the tree and then the window. Using that to align the easel that would hold the photo paper under two different enlargers, I made several trial exposures, and along the way added the moon from another negative. Metaphorically the composite evokes the tree of life or World Tree with its roots in the divine.

Celestial Roots has been exhibited in a variety of venues,. It was made into a gold plaque as a prestigous award for a nonprofit organization. And I’m especially honored that my daughter and her husband chose it as the visual theme for their wedding.

Wabi-Sabi: The Art of Impermanence

Posted on by

The Japanese way of seeing beauty in entropy

We tend to think of entropy as something “bad,” the inevitable tendency for matter to dissipate, for all living things to die. As embodied creatures, we naturally would prefer to avoid this downward spiral—for ourselves, loved ones, pets, creations, cherished objects and the systems we use in order to function. And because death is so mysterious and ultimate, it’s not surprising that it has been and continues to be primary subject matter for storytellers across all cultures and media.

Japanese artists have another way of looking at entropy. For them, wabi-sabi is both a worldview and an aesthetic perspective based on the acceptance and appreciation of impermanence and imperfection. I so much respect the shift in consciousness it requires. When entropy is viewed as impermanence, a natural and cosmic principle, the aging process can be seen as beautiful. It’s all about perception—how we see.

In Wabi-Sabi For Artists, Designers, Poets And Philosophers, American artist Leonard Koren points out that the Japanese hesitate to explain wabi-sabi, but most will claim to understand how it feels. According to Wikipedia, “wabi connotes rustic simplicity, freshness or quietness and can be applied to both natural and human-made objects, or understated elegance… It refers to the creation of beauty through the inclusion of imperfection, focusing on subject matter that is asymmetrical, austere, simple, quiet and modest. Also, it appreciates the randomness of nature and natural processes… And “sabi is beauty or serenity that comes with age, when the life of the object and its impermanence are evidenced in its patina and wear, or in any visible repairs.”

It regards the signs of dissipation or decay as beautiful—peeling paint, a wilting flower, rusting or pitted metal. According to Mr. Koren, wabi-sabi is “the most conspicuous and characteristic feature of traditional Japanese beauty.”

Andrew Juniper, owner of the Wabi-Sabi Design Company in the UK, observes that “If an object of expression can bring about, within us, a sense of serene melancholy and a spiritual longing, then that object could be said to be wabi-sabi. It’s for this reason that the bowls used in Japanese tea ceremonies are rustic, simple, sometimes pitted and not quite symmetrical.”

It’s also why fine art and contemplative photographer’s are drawn to areas where entropy is well underway, including junk yards, abandoned structures, neglected neighborhoods and back alleys. When composed and lit well, textures born of age and weathering can be pleasing and interesting, at times dramatic.

Always, they present an opportunity to practice composition and explore one’s aesthetic. Images made in such places can evoke the sensibilities of aging, abuse and neglect. And for some, they can encourage contemplation.

By putting on a wabi-sabi “hat” or mindset, the artist can become more attuned to the subject’s characteristic energies—asymmetry, simplicity, quietness and imperfection, how the elements in a composition feel rather than look.

Wabi-sabi is neither smooth nor complex. It’s the bark of a tree and broken branches, cracks in a vase or brick wall, creases in a tablecloth, peeling paint or the random spill of oil on a blacktop surface. It’s not the smooth skin or perky expression of the young. Rather, it’s the character lines and calm demeanor that come with age.

Young and aspiring photographers tend to think they have to travel in order to find appealing subject matter. If the intent is to produce “calendar art” that may be so. But for those more interested in exploring through the exercise of their unique personal aesthetic, I recommend the practice of wabi-sabi. I also recommend working close to home because it presents more of a challenge to seeing with fresh eyes and activating the inner eye of understanding a subject’s essence and history beyond surface appearances. For instance, what does this or any expressive image evoke or reveal? What does it say about this object’s owner or user? Or human nature?

As perception expands and deepens, we better appreciate that entropy is a natural and cosmic process. Images of impermanence present the artist with a world of opportunities to explore his or her perceptual capabilities and connect to this awesome and beautiful force.

Our souls are all made of the same paper; our uniqueness, though, comes from the creases in that paper from the folding and unfolding of our experiences.

Jiddu Krishnamurti, Indian philosopher, speaker and writer

ABOUT THESE IMAGES (Images are not “photographs” until they are printed)

Rendering subjects in black and white is particularly conducive to wabi-sabi because the emotional appeal of color doesn’t overpower the characteristics of form, texture and simplicity in the aging process. One of the challenges for the visual artist then, is to see all things and all people as beautiful.

 

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

 

A Woods, Lovely Dark and Deep

Posted on by

Whose woods these are I think I know.

His house is in the village though;

He will not see me stopping here

To watch his woods fill up with snow.

My little horse must think it queer

To stop without a farmhouse near

Between the woods and frozen lake

The darkest evening of the year.

He gives his harness bells a shake

To ask if there is some mistake.

The only other sound’s the sweep

Of easy wind and downy flake.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep,

But I have promises to keep,

And miles to go before I sleep,

And miles to go before I sleep.

Robert Frost, Woods on a Snowy Evening

Our Story Is A Birth

Posted on by

Awakening to the truth of who we are and what we can become together

About two-thousand years ago a radical idea was born, presaged by a star that guided some wise men to a cave in Bethlehem. That idea, “Love they neighbor,” is a simple admonition admired by many but so challenging that, after all these years, humanity is still having trouble putting it into practice.

The evolution of human consciousness (values, beliefs, perspectives) is a slow process, punctuated by crises that lead to relatively sudden leaps forward, largely due to shifts in perception introduced by great thinkers, visionaries, mystics and prophets. In the current era, the rapid development of communication technologies, ideological differences and the widening gap between the wealthy “haves” and “have nots” has precipitated a compounding of crises worldwide in nearly every sphere of activity. The commonplace impression is that humanity appears to be taking a step backward rather than forward.

Systemically, because crisis precedes and gives rise to transformation, breakdowns can be regarded as “evolutionary drivers,” nudging us to grow in consciousness individually and collectively. By this I mean we must actualize the injunction to love our neighbors and expand our circle of caring to include everyone, including the planet.

It’s been said that humanity’s greatest challenge has always been and continues to be ignorance—we don’t know who we are. Overall, we haven’t yet connected to the animating spark within that is our essence. We don’t realize that all matter, including bodies and spirits, originated in and are extensions of the One, the Source or Infinite Intelligence, whatever name we prefer. We are one human family, interconnected and interdependent, struggling to coordinate, to learn the purpose and right use of our personal and collective power.

“Me first!” “Let somebody else clean it up.” “If it’s legal it’s alright, even if it’s immoral.” “If it can be done, we’ll do it regardless of consequences.” “We’re better than…” “We know better than…” “Our way is the right way.” “I’m not my brother’s keeper.” “Wealth at the top trickles down.” “Grab & run!” These are among the attitudes currently choking civilization.

Ultimately, the healing of ignorance at every level requires the activation of wisdom, balance, whole system understanding and respectful engagement, qualities that are largely developed in the context of a humanizing education. Beyond “subjects” and “skills,” education of the whole person informs, encourages and empowers a life of meaning and grace, ethics and integrity, right-relationship, lifelong learning, contribution and fulfillment. While training for jobs is important and necessary, without whole person development jobs get done but the virtues that contribute to our being more fully human get little or no attention. What’s under construction in human evolution are the qualities of love, compassion, kindness, appreciation and gratitude.

Arguably the most significant consequence of ignorance is intolerance. It’s human nature to notice and respond negatively to differences because they present a potential threat. But taken to extremes in acts of violence, whether personal, social or political, the bulk of humanity is learning that in order to not live in a world where violence is commonplace, each and every child has to be loved, respected and valued for who they are, as they are—and empowered to become the best version of themselves.

As I’ve often noted, the way to maintain the viability and vitality of a social system (business, community, nation, world) is to ensure that the needs of each member are being met and their unique gifts are developed and expressed. Only then can a person be in right-relationship with the other members of the system. Ultimately then, the healing of intolerance is love they neighbor.

Another consequence of ignorance is the illusion of separation. Because living systems at all levels are constituted of lower-level beings and unite to form higher levels systems, they are both social and interdependent, unable to survive for very long on their own as individuals. To the extent that any member is isolated, his work and worth to the systems above him is diminished. Seeing ourselves separate fosters fear and promotes greed. And the compounding of acts that advantage self without regard to others can carry devastating consequences for the whole—as when legislators turn a blind eye or vote favorably for companies that are abusing the environment. The stresses brought on by the perception of separation are teaching us that life, throughout the universe, is one whole, interconnected and interdependent system. Ultimately then, the healing of separation is the perception that all is one and we all have skin in the game. No matter one’s status or wealth, we rise and fall together.

Fear is the force that sustains separation and promotes division. Human beings can’t or won’t come together to collaborate, create or celebrate in a climate of fear. Of the drivers mentioned above, fear is perhaps the most widespread, difficult to overcome and trending, particularly when the mass media feed unhealthy and daily doses of breakdowns and possible threats into the social body. While I wouldn’t say that the commercial mass media systems are purposefully fostering ignorance and fear, they are the inadvertent consequences of a competitive system designed to maximize profits. As a consequence, what’s largely missing are programs and services that uplift, inspire, encourage and empower. On the consumer side, both in media and politics we cast a vote for more of the same when we spend our attention capital on the status quo.

Ultimately, the healing of fear is love. And that, at the very least, requires the perception that human beings, even those that appear and think differently, are good and intend to do good. This perception appears to be taking a long time to occur, but for those who understand that we are the architects of our lives, a change of heart and mind can be lived immediately.

While Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus for a variety of religious reasons, persons of all persuasions can rejoice in the birth of the paradigms he established—universal unconditional love and forgiveness. Indeed, at this time of year we celebrate His birth, teachings and example. And observe that our story is also a birth, an awakening to and realization of our higher potentials as individuals, nations and species.

May the leaders and wise ones of our time, perhaps by looking at images from space telescopes, gain a sense of the vastness and beauty of the universe beyond, and perhaps by encountering the right person at the right time and being guided by spirit, see the spark of goodness and higher potentials that reside within us all.

When human society practices agape, the promotion of the wellbeing of one another, the cosmos will be performing, on this very complexly organized level itself, a divine act. By its consciousness and its caring the cosmos will become ecstatic—transcend itself and its investment in individual or group ‘self-interest’—and its ecstasy will give birth to divine life.

Beatrice Bruteau, American contemplative, philosopher, author

_____________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net

Giving And Receiving Gifts

Posted on by

A creative act that makes a powerful statement

Ethan Miller, my grandson, when he was four

Wouldn’t we all like to get this kind of response from those we deeply care about—at any age? Gifting is a critically significant form of communication, extending as far back as one Neanderthal offering a cherished stone or bone to another.

Marriage and political alliances were sealed and terminated over the exchange of gifts. Historian Dorothy Johansen describes the gift-giving dynamic among the indigenous people of the Pacific Northwest Coast of Canada: “In the potlatch, the host in effect challenged a guest chieftain to exceed him in his ‘power’ to give away or to destroy goods. If the guest did not return 100 percent on the gifts received and destroy even more wealth in a bigger and better bonfire, he and his people lost face and so his power was diminished. Hierarchical relations within and between clans, villages, and nations, were observed and reinforced through the distribution or sometimes destruction of wealth, dance performances, and other ceremonies. The status of any given family is raised not by who has the most resources, but by who distributes the most resources. The hosts demonstrate their wealth and prominence through giving away goods.”

Anthropologist Franz Boas reported that “Every present received at a potlatch has to be returned at another potlatch, and a man who would not give his feast in due time would be considered as not paying his debts.” My anthropology teacher, Dr. Beth Dillingham, said the Northwest Coast families would amass great wealth over a number of years and then give it all away to those who came to witness the rite of passage. Being tied to religion, these massive giving events were perceived as ceremonies and rites of passage rather than celebrations or negotiations. They would go on for days, and when everything was gone, the host was considered powerful—because he’d demonstrated his powerful spirit. All this to say that the giving of gifts is one of the most fundamental human activities across time and cultures.

As part of the research for one of my stories I read about subtext and it helped me to see that underlying meanings are a significant part of gift giving. When we say “It’s not the gift, it’s the thought that matters,” we’re essentially saying it’s the subtext, what the gift and its manner of presentation represent. What does it say, for instance, about a gift wrapped in a garbage or grocery bag? A gift that’s casually tossed onto someone’s lap? A gift that benefits the giver as much as the receiver? What does it say when everyone gets the same gift? Or no gift at all? Gifts speak loudly and clearly. In a matter of seconds the receiver understands the subtext. That’s why, if we really care about someone, we want the gift to say so.

The movie Dolly Parton’s Christmas of Many Colors: The Circle of Love moved me to contemplate this theme. The true story, beautifully produced, tells how Dolly’s father saw her mother admiring a ring in a store. He wanted to get it for her, particularly because they hadn’t had enough money to buy a ring when they got married. Still, he couldn’t afford it. When his eleven kids realized how badly he wanted the ring for his wife, they secretly met together and decided to give their father the cost of the one gift they each wanted. It wasn’t enough, so Dolly’s father, against his wife’s wishes, went off to work in a coal mine. Long story short, miracles happened and Dolly’s father surprised his wife with the ring on Christmas morning. Here was a demonstration of deep and precious love, the giving of self, of blood, sweat and tears in order to give joy—and communicate love. Indeed, when the message is love and caring, it’s not so much the object given as what it says. And the sacrifice of time or a cherished object for the sake of another is arguably the epitome of genuine caring.

The challenge for those of us who are privileged, is to make or find a gift, a “text” that conveys the subtext of love, caring or appreciation. Most everyone wants to be seen for who they authentically are. Gifts that acknowledge this require paying attention—well in advance of presentation—to the objects and experiences that will please, excite or feed an interest or concern of the receiver. Although we browse for gifts in stores and online because we’ve been indoctrinated to do so in our culture, the more direct way to objectify feelings and sentiments is to give the gift of time, energy or creativity, for instance by making, writing, performing or providing something that touches the heart.

In our early marriage, Linda taught me that women in general hope for a gift from their significant other that’s personal rather than utilitarian—something the affirms or reflects their values, qualities and virtues. Books, appliances, tickets to an event, electronics, music, videos and so on are fine, but they speak to interests, whereas personal items speak, well, to the person—how they are seen, appreciated and loved. Men on the other hand—speaking for myself and observing other men—tend to hope for gifts that are generally less personal and more utilitarian, objects we can use to play with, grow, construct, learn or otherwise support our work and interests.

When the intended recipients have everything they need or can buy what they want, we sometimes exchange lists to insure the recipient’s satisfaction. The subtext not only says “I want you to have what you really want,” it also provides the gift of time saved—by not needing to return an unwanted item. It’s a win-win strategy. The downside is the lack of a surprise, and for some people that’s important. Besides offering the expected in this way, a handwritten message—perhaps a compliment, appreciation or intention along with it—can enhance the subtext.

When I think of all the gifts I’ve given my daughter at Christmas time, the one that’s most memorable for both of us is a poem I wrote for her when she was in her early twenties. It was called The Tapestry Of Your Life. I haven’t been able to top it since. She framed it and occasionally mentions that the metaphor it contains continues to inspire her, even provide application in her work. Direct expressions like this are gifts that go beyond hope and expectation. They are gifts from the heart.

A subtle but significant gift that the receiver can give the giver is that of genuine gratitude for what is received, even if it’s not the perfect gift. I think it’s as important to know how to receive a gift as it is to give one. And this is important for children to learn. Because gifting is culturally conditioned, they need to be taught the significance, purpose and the rituals of presentation and appreciation. Actually, an excited or positive response along with gratitude is an in-kind gift itself. I know our conversations about gift-giving and receiving when Jennifer was growing up, especially as Linda wrapped gifts, made a difference in this regard. And every time I wrap a present I thank my dad for taking me shopping and showing me how to wrap packages.

If you’re looking for unusual and exceptional gift ideas that deliver loving subtextual messages for children, I highly recommend Jennifer’s blog. Among other inspiring ideas there you’ll read—

In addition to these imaginative toys, you might consider how can you give something that offers your child a part of you? This does not refer to anything store bought. Could you write a letter about what you learn from your child or all the good you see in them? Could you draw him? Could you frame your favorite picture of her? Could you write your wishes for her future? Think about how you might treat your child to an heirloom—a gift of your love—that they might keep well beyond their childhood years.

Jennifer Smith Miller, Parenting coach, author Confident Parents Confident Kids

___________________________________

My other sites—

Love And Light greetings.com: A twice-weekly blog featuring wisdom quotes and perspectives in science and spirituality intended to inspire and empower

David L. Smith Photography Portfolio.com: Black and white and color photography

Ancient Maya Cultural Traits.com: Weekly blog featuring the traits that made this civilization unique 

smithdl@fuse.net